RenardV1, PubMed, Checkpoint, bibRecord, 000338

Costs and benefits of rabies control in wildlife in France.

Identifieur interne : 000338 ( PubMed/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000337; suivant : 000339

Costs and benefits of rabies control in wildlife in France.

Auteurs : M F Aubert [France]

Source :

Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics) [ 0253-1933 ] ; 1999.

RBID : pubmed:10472684

Descripteurs français

Wicri :
- geographic : France.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Animals, Animals, Wild, Cattle, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Disease Outbreaks (economics), Disease Outbreaks (veterinary), Foxes, France (epidemiology), Humans, Rabies (economics), Rabies (epidemiology), Rabies (prevention & control), Rabies (veterinary), Vaccination (economics), Vaccination (veterinary).
MESH :
- geographic , epidemiology : France.
- economics : Disease Outbreaks, Rabies, Vaccination.
- epidemiology : Rabies.
- prevention & control : Rabies.
- veterinary : Disease Outbreaks, Rabies, Vaccination.
- Animals, Animals, Wild, Cattle, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Foxes, Humans.

Abstract

The author presents an evaluation of the cost of wildlife rabies in France. This study included the vaccination of domestic animals, the reinforcement of epidemiological surveillance networks and the support provided to diagnostic laboratories, the expenses associated with outbreaks of rabies (animal losses and associated economic losses), the clinical observation of those animals which had bitten humans and the preventive vaccination and post-exposure treatment of humans. A substantial percentage (72%) of this cost was the preventive vaccination of domestic animals. In France, as in other European countries in which the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is the species most affected, to main strategies for controlling the disease at the reservoir level were evaluated, namely: fox depopulation and the oral vaccination of foxes. The combined costs and benefits of rabies and of both strategies were compared and included either the cost of fox culling or the cost of oral vaccination (baits, bait delivery and follow-up to ensure the efficiency of the vaccination). The cumulative annual costs of both strategies remained comparable until the fourth year, after which the oral vaccination strategy became beneficial. This forecast was made in 1988, readjusted in 1993 and confirmed by ex post analysis five years later. The expected benefits of oral vaccination have now been obtained. Fox depopulation has only ever resulted in a transient lull in the occurrence of the disease, while oral vaccination has proved to be capable of eliminating rabies even in situations in which fox populations were increasing.

PubMed: 10472684

Affiliations:

France

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 000361
to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 000361

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:10472684

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Costs and benefits of rabies control in wildlife in France.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Aubert, M F" sort="Aubert, M F" uniqKey="Aubert M" first="M F" last="Aubert">M F Aubert</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Management on Zoonoses Control, OIE Reference Laboratory for Rabies, Malzéville, France.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Management on Zoonoses Control, OIE Reference Laboratory for Rabies, Malzéville</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Malzéville</wicri:noRegion>
<wicri:noRegion>Malzéville</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="1999">1999</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:10472684</idno>
<idno type="pmid">10472684</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000361</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000361</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000361</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000361</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000361</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000361</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Costs and benefits of rabies control in wildlife in France.</title>
<author><name sortKey="Aubert, M F" sort="Aubert, M F" uniqKey="Aubert M" first="M F" last="Aubert">M F Aubert</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Management on Zoonoses Control, OIE Reference Laboratory for Rabies, Malzéville, France.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea>WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Management on Zoonoses Control, OIE Reference Laboratory for Rabies, Malzéville</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Malzéville</wicri:noRegion>
<wicri:noRegion>Malzéville</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j">Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0253-1933</idno>
<imprint><date when="1999" type="published">1999</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term>
<term>Animals, Wild</term>
<term>Cattle</term>
<term>Cost-Benefit Analysis</term>
<term>Disease Outbreaks (economics)</term>
<term>Disease Outbreaks (veterinary)</term>
<term>Foxes</term>
<term>France (epidemiology)</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Rabies (economics)</term>
<term>Rabies (epidemiology)</term>
<term>Rabies (prevention & control)</term>
<term>Rabies (veterinary)</term>
<term>Vaccination (economics)</term>
<term>Vaccination (veterinary)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>France</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en"><term>Disease Outbreaks</term>
<term>Rabies</term>
<term>Vaccination</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Rabies</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="prevention & control" xml:lang="en"><term>Rabies</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="veterinary" xml:lang="en"><term>Disease Outbreaks</term>
<term>Rabies</term>
<term>Vaccination</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Animals</term>
<term>Animals, Wild</term>
<term>Cattle</term>
<term>Cost-Benefit Analysis</term>
<term>Foxes</term>
<term>Humans</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>France</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The author presents an evaluation of the cost of wildlife rabies in France. This study included the vaccination of domestic animals, the reinforcement of epidemiological surveillance networks and the support provided to diagnostic laboratories, the expenses associated with outbreaks of rabies (animal losses and associated economic losses), the clinical observation of those animals which had bitten humans and the preventive vaccination and post-exposure treatment of humans. A substantial percentage (72%) of this cost was the preventive vaccination of domestic animals. In France, as in other European countries in which the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is the species most affected, to main strategies for controlling the disease at the reservoir level were evaluated, namely: fox depopulation and the oral vaccination of foxes. The combined costs and benefits of rabies and of both strategies were compared and included either the cost of fox culling or the cost of oral vaccination (baits, bait delivery and follow-up to ensure the efficiency of the vaccination). The cumulative annual costs of both strategies remained comparable until the fourth year, after which the oral vaccination strategy became beneficial. This forecast was made in 1988, readjusted in 1993 and confirmed by ex post analysis five years later. The expected benefits of oral vaccination have now been obtained. Fox depopulation has only ever resulted in a transient lull in the occurrence of the disease, while oral vaccination has proved to be capable of eliminating rabies even in situations in which fox populations were increasing.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">10472684</PMID>
<DateCreated><Year>1999</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>08</Day>
</DateCreated>
<DateCompleted><Year>1999</Year>
<Month>12</Month>
<Day>08</Day>
</DateCompleted>
<DateRevised><Year>2005</Year>
<Month>11</Month>
<Day>16</Day>
</DateRevised>
<Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0253-1933</ISSN>
<JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>18</Volume>
<Issue>2</Issue>
<PubDate><Year>1999</Year>
<Month>Aug</Month>
</PubDate>
</JournalIssue>
<Title>Revue scientifique et technique (International Office of Epizootics)</Title>
<ISOAbbreviation>Rev. - Off. Int. Epizoot.</ISOAbbreviation>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Costs and benefits of rabies control in wildlife in France.</ArticleTitle>
<Pagination><MedlinePgn>533-43</MedlinePgn>
</Pagination>
<Abstract><AbstractText>The author presents an evaluation of the cost of wildlife rabies in France. This study included the vaccination of domestic animals, the reinforcement of epidemiological surveillance networks and the support provided to diagnostic laboratories, the expenses associated with outbreaks of rabies (animal losses and associated economic losses), the clinical observation of those animals which had bitten humans and the preventive vaccination and post-exposure treatment of humans. A substantial percentage (72%) of this cost was the preventive vaccination of domestic animals. In France, as in other European countries in which the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is the species most affected, to main strategies for controlling the disease at the reservoir level were evaluated, namely: fox depopulation and the oral vaccination of foxes. The combined costs and benefits of rabies and of both strategies were compared and included either the cost of fox culling or the cost of oral vaccination (baits, bait delivery and follow-up to ensure the efficiency of the vaccination). The cumulative annual costs of both strategies remained comparable until the fourth year, after which the oral vaccination strategy became beneficial. This forecast was made in 1988, readjusted in 1993 and confirmed by ex post analysis five years later. The expected benefits of oral vaccination have now been obtained. Fox depopulation has only ever resulted in a transient lull in the occurrence of the disease, while oral vaccination has proved to be capable of eliminating rabies even in situations in which fox populations were increasing.</AbstractText>
</Abstract>
<AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Aubert</LastName>
<ForeName>M F</ForeName>
<Initials>MF</Initials>
<AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Management on Zoonoses Control, OIE Reference Laboratory for Rabies, Malzéville, France.</Affiliation>
</AffiliationInfo>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<Language>eng</Language>
<PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType>
<PublicationType UI="D016454">Review</PublicationType>
</PublicationTypeList>
</Article>
<MedlineJournalInfo><Country>France</Country>
<MedlineTA>Rev Sci Tech</MedlineTA>
<NlmUniqueID>8712301</NlmUniqueID>
<ISSNLinking>0253-1933</ISSNLinking>
</MedlineJournalInfo>
<CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset>
<MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000818" MajorTopicYN="N">Animals</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D000835" MajorTopicYN="Y">Animals, Wild</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D002417" MajorTopicYN="N">Cattle</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003362" MajorTopicYN="N">Cost-Benefit Analysis</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D004196" MajorTopicYN="N">Disease Outbreaks</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000662" MajorTopicYN="N">veterinary</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005589" MajorTopicYN="Y">Foxes</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005602" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">France</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011818" MajorTopicYN="N">Rabies</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000517" MajorTopicYN="N">prevention & control</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000662" MajorTopicYN="Y">veterinary</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
<MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D014611" MajorTopicYN="N">Vaccination</DescriptorName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000191" MajorTopicYN="N">economics</QualifierName>
<QualifierName UI="Q000662" MajorTopicYN="N">veterinary</QualifierName>
</MeshHeading>
</MeshHeadingList>
<NumberOfReferences>17</NumberOfReferences>
</MedlineCitation>
<PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>1999</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>3</Day>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>1999</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>3</Day>
<Hour>0</Hour>
<Minute>1</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
<PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>1999</Year>
<Month>9</Month>
<Day>3</Day>
<Hour>0</Hour>
<Minute>0</Minute>
</PubMedPubDate>
</History>
<PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus>
<ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10472684</ArticleId>
</ArticleIdList>
</PubmedData>
</pubmed>
<affiliations><list><country><li>France</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree><country name="France"><noRegion><name sortKey="Aubert, M F" sort="Aubert, M F" uniqKey="Aubert M" first="M F" last="Aubert">M F Aubert</name>
</noRegion>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Bois/explor/RenardV1/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000338 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000338 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Wicri/Bois
   |area=    RenardV1
   |flux=    PubMed
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:10472684
   |texte=   Costs and benefits of rabies control in wildlife in France.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:10472684" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a RenardV1

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.27.
Data generation: Tue Mar 28 00:55:51 2017. Site generation: Thu Jan 4 16:57:14 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur le renard
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur le renard

Costs and benefits of rabies control in wildlife in France.

Costs and benefits of rabies control in wildlife in France.

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

Pour générer des pages wiki